CMS Hospice
VITAS INNOVATIVE HOSPICE CARE OF GREATER WASH, DC
WASHINGTON, DC
Independent research from official CMS public records. No paid ranking. No Trust Hub quality score.
Research this hospice using CMS public records. CMS Hospice CCN 091505. An office county is not proof of the full service area.
At a glance
CMS Hospice research snapshot
Office county
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Office county is not a verified service area.
CMS ZIP coverage records
34 CMS-published ZIP observations. Not a verified county service area.
CMS ownership-change history
CMS does not publish a Hospice ownership-change event file. Absence of a CHOW record here is not proof that ownership never changed.
Hospice quality measures stay separate from CAHPS Hospice Survey results. Missing evidence is shown as not reported, not as zero.
Quality measures
What CMS reports about Hospice quality
CMS Hospice quality measures
68 CMS observations in this family. Survey scores are not clinical quality scores.
- Average Daily Census83
- Beliefs & Values Addressed (if desired by the patient)212
- Beliefs & Values Addressed (if desired by the patient)98.58
- Burdensome transitions, Type 1 (% live discharges)58
- Burdensome transitions, Type 1 (% live discharges)8.8
- Burdensome transitions, Type 1 (% live discharges)137
- Burdensome transitions, Type 2 (% live discharges)137
- Burdensome transitions, Type 2 (% live discharges)5.1
- Burdensome transitions, Type 2 (% live discharges)89
- Care Provided in All other locations0
- Care Provided in Assisted Living Facility14
- Care Provided in Home63
Family experience
CMS CAHPS Hospice Survey measures
CAHPS Hospice Survey results are family-experience scores, not clinical quality.
CMS CAHPS Hospice Survey measures
21 CMS observations in this family. Survey scores are not clinical quality scores.
- Caregivers rated the hospice agency a 6 or lower10
- Caregivers rated the hospice agency a 7 or 814
- Caregivers rated the hospice agency a 9 or 1076
- Family caregiver survey ratingNot Applicable
- NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospice8
- The hospice team always communicated well77
- The hospice team always provided timely help63
- The hospice team always treated the patient with respect89
- The hospice team did |not| provide the right amount of emotional and spiritual support16
- The hospice team provided the right amount of emotional and spiritual support84
- The hospice team sometimes or never communicated well9
- The hospice team sometimes or never provided timely help15
Ownership & management
Who CMS/PECOS connects to this provider
Current ownership uses CURRENT OWNED_BY evidence only. UNKNOWN is not a former owner.
Current owners
- CHEMED CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- CHEMED CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- CHEMED CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- CHEMED CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- CHEMED CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
- CHEMED CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- CHEMED CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- COMFORT CARE HOLDINGS COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- COMFORT CARE HOLDINGS COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- COMFORT CARE HOLDINGS COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- COMFORT CARE HOLDINGS COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- COMFORT CARE HOLDINGS COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- COMFORT CARE HOLDINGS COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- COMFORT CARE HOLDINGS COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- VITAS HEALTHCARE CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- VITAS HEALTHCARE CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- VITAS HEALTHCARE CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- VITAS HEALTHCARE CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- VITAS HEALTHCARE CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- VITAS HEALTHCARE CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- VITAS HEALTHCARE CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- VITAS HOSPICE SERVICES, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- VITAS HOSPICE SERVICES, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- VITAS HOSPICE SERVICES, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
- VITAS HOSPICE SERVICES, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100% ownership interest
Showing 25 of 28 relationships from CMS/PECOS evidence.
Operators
No resolved CMS/PECOS relationships in this category.
Managers
- CAMPBELL-LITTLE, SHANISEIndividual owner · CURRENTW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE0% ownership interest
- DEAN, BEVERLYIndividual owner · CURRENTW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE0% ownership interest
- IRACKI, DANIELIndividual owner · CURRENTW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE0% ownership interest
- KATSOFF, BRITTNEYIndividual owner · CURRENTW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE0% ownership interest
- LADISA-GONZALEZ, PATRICIAIndividual owner · CURRENTW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE0% ownership interest
- LADISA-GONZALEZ, PATRICIAIndividual owner · CURRENTW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE
- LANGAN, TIMOTHYIndividual owner · CURRENTW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE0% ownership interest
- LUSEBRINK, LAURAIndividual owner · CURRENTW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE0% ownership interest
- MCCLURE, EVALISAIndividual owner · CURRENTW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE0% ownership interest
- MCNALLY, MELISSAIndividual owner · CURRENTW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE0% ownership interest
- MIGNONE, TOMIndividual owner · CURRENTW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE0% ownership interest
- NDI, KATEIndividual owner · CURRENTW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE0% ownership interest
- PLINER, LILLIANIndividual owner · CURRENTW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE0% ownership interest
- TSAO, KUANG-WENIndividual owner · CURRENTW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE0% ownership interest
Ownership observations with UNKNOWN status
These relationships were observed in an older snapshot. UNKNOWN does not mean former owner, previous owner, or that ownership ended.
UNKNOWN
No resolved CMS/PECOS relationships in this category.
Ownership change history
CMS ownership-change records
CMS does not publish a Hospice ownership-change event file. Absence of a CHOW record here is not proof that ownership never changed.
Source freshness
How current each evidence family is
- hospice-all-owners
- CURRENT · source as of 2026-08-19
- hospice-general-information
- CURRENT · source as of 2026-08-19
- hospice-provider-cahps
- CURRENT · source as of 2026-08-07
- hospice-provider-data
- CURRENT · source as of 2026-08-07
- hospice-zip-data
- CURRENT · source as of 2026-08-18
Profile generated 2026-09-18. That timestamp is not CMS evidence freshness.
Methodology
How Trust Hub researches this provider
- Ownership evidence is not a quality measure.
- Missing evidence is not a zero score.
- CMS ratings are CMS ratings, not Trust Hub ratings.
- The Hospice General Information directory is the current-provider denominator.
- Quality-only typed CCNs are not current-directory providers.
- CMS ZIP coverage records are not a verified county service area.
- CMS does not publish a Hospice ownership-change event file.