Staffing
CMS publishes a 3-star staffing rating for this facility.
RN staffing was 1.25 hours per resident day in 2026Q1, calculated from CMS PBJ records.
View staffing evidenceAsk Trust Hub Network
Also known publicly as Shore View Nursing and Rehabilitation
BROOKLYN, NY
CMS overview
No proprietary TrustHub score. These ratings are published separately by CMS.
Facility information
CMS remains the primary federal record. Public website and additional contact details appear only when independently verified.
State regulatory evidence
New York State Department of Health is the state source for this license record. It does not replace CMS federal certification, ratings, or certified-bed counts.
New York State Department of Health
State regulatory data · checked Aug 2026
Decision guide
Factual evidence to examine before you decide. These summaries are not a score or recommendation.
CMS publishes a 3-star staffing rating for this facility.
RN staffing was 1.25 hours per resident day in 2026Q1, calculated from CMS PBJ records.
View staffing evidenceThe latest standard inspection on Jul 23, 2025 cited 0 deficiencies.
View inspection evidenceCMS-published records list 21 ownership or control parties.
View ownership evidenceCMS groups this facility with a chain covering 13 facilities across 1 states or territories.
View chain evidenceOwnership & operation
Operator, licensee, owner, manager, and chain stay separate. A connected organization is not automatically the party that runs daily operations.
Supported by multiple government sources
SeniorTrustHub found evidence connecting this facility to:
Ownership
These are CMS-published ownership disclosures. Medicare enrollment ownership and managerial-control information is reported by enrolled providers through CMS forms; it is not an independent determination of beneficial ownership.
Individual · 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Published ownership percentage: 33%
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 17, 2013
Individual · 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Published ownership percentage: 5%
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 17, 2013
Individual · 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Published ownership percentage: 30%
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 17, 2013
Individual · 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Published ownership percentage: 33%
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 17, 2013
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 17, 2013
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 17, 2013
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 17, 2013
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 17, 2013
Individual · OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 17, 2013
Individual · OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 17, 2013
Individual · 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Published ownership percentage: 32.5%
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 17, 2013
Individual · 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Published ownership percentage: 5%
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 17, 2013
Individual · 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Published ownership percentage: 30%
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 17, 2013
Individual · 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Published ownership percentage: 32.5%
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 17, 2013
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Published ownership percentage: 32.5%
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 17, 2013
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Published ownership percentage: 5%
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 17, 2013
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Published ownership percentage: 30%
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 17, 2013
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Published ownership percentage: 32.5%
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 17, 2013
Individual · OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 17, 2013
Individual · OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 17, 2013
Organization · Medicare-enrolled legal organization
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across NY.
Roles are shown as CMS publishes them. Different CMS sources can describe different enrollment, ownership, and control concepts, so TrustHub keeps each source-specific disclosure distinct.
Chain context
Chain-level values describe this CMS-defined group, not any one facility. CMS Chain ID 119 is a grouping identifier, not a legal organization.
| Month | Facilities | Overall rating | Staffing rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wed Jul | 13 | 3.9 | 2.8 |
| Mon Jun | 13 | 3.8 | 2.9 |
| Fri May | 13 | 3.8 | 2.9 |
| Wed Apr | 15 | 3.5 | 2.9 |
| Sun Mar | 15 | 3.7 | 2.7 |
| Sun Feb | 14 | 3.6 | 2.6 |
Nursing Home Chain Performance Measures, fixed version da2db00a-0f3d-40a9-a535-588ff1220c55. Membership comes separately from CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Enrollments.
View official CMS sourceInspections & deficiencies
Scope and severity terms below are CMS classifications. They are not a TrustHub score.
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
CMS scope/severity D: Isolated; No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy.
Correction status: Deficient, Provider has date of correction (Sep 23, 2025)
No health-deficiency rows were deterministically linked to this inspection.
No health-deficiency rows were deterministically linked to this inspection.
No health-deficiency rows were deterministically linked to this inspection.
No health-deficiency rows were deterministically linked to this inspection.
No health-deficiency rows were deterministically linked to this inspection.
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
CMS scope/severity D: Isolated; No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy.
Correction status: Past Non-Compliance (Jan 24, 2022)
Penalties & enforcement
No penalty records were found for this provider in the currently loaded CMS Penalties dataset.
Facility history
4 historical events available. Dates and values come from published CMS and official state regulator evidence, not a score.
1 deficiency was recorded.
CMS · Recorded event date · View related evidence
No linked health-deficiency findings were recorded for this survey.
CMS · Recorded event date · View related evidence
No linked health-deficiency findings were recorded for this survey.
CMS · Recorded event date · View related evidence
1 deficiency was recorded.
CMS · Recorded event date · View related evidence
Staffing
CMS staffing rating: 3 of 5 stars. CMS calculates that rating separately using its published methodology. The values below are calculations from daily PBJ records for 2026Q1 (current source quarter).
| Measure | Monday–Friday | Saturday–Sunday |
|---|---|---|
| Total nursing | 3.416 | 3.049 |
| RN categories | 1.33 | 1.063 |
Contract staff accounted for 6.8% of reported nursing hours included in this quarter calculation.
Reported RN-category hours per resident day were 0.038 lower than the prior loaded quarter.
Solid bar: Total nursing · Outlined bar: RN categories
| Quarter | Total nursing | RN categories | LPN/LVN | CNA | Contract share | Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025Q2 | 3.563 | 1.335 | 0.062 | 2.166 | 4.1% | 91 |
| 2025Q3 | 3.582 | 1.387 | 0.062 | 2.133 | 4.4% | 92 |
| 2025Q4 | 3.388 | 1.29 | 0.059 | 2.039 | 6.2% | 92 |
| 2026Q1 | 3.31 | 1.252 | 0.06 | 1.998 | 6.8% | 90 |
Hours-per-resident-day values are calculated by this platform from CMS-published daily PBJ hours and MDS census. For each displayed period, included hours are summed and divided by the summed census for days with a positive census. They are not CMS case-mix-adjusted staffing measures or a staffing rating.
View official CMS PBJ sourceWhat we can verify today
These measures come from the current successfully ingested CMS Nursing Home Provider Information release.
Planned evidence layers
These areas require separate authoritative CMS datasets. No findings are shown until those sources are ingested and reviewed.
Trust participation
Claims, corrections, and factual context are free. Submissions never replace CMS evidence or affect ranking.
Source register
No paid placements. Facilities cannot pay to rank higher. We cite. You decide.