Staffing
CMS publishes a 5-star staffing rating for this facility.
RN staffing was 1.35 hours per resident day in 2026Q1, calculated from CMS PBJ records.
View staffing evidenceASK TRUST HUB NETWORK
You are on SeniorTrustHub — CMS / supported state senior-care research.
CHATSWORTH AT PGA NATIONAL has 62 certified beds in PALM BEACH GARDENS, Florida. The CMS overall rating is 5 of 5, compared with the Florida average of 3.3. The CMS health inspection rating is 5 of 5, compared with the Florida average of 2.9. The CMS staffing rating is 5 of 5. The latest standard health survey on Apr 17, 2025 lists 1 deficiencies, compared with the Florida average of 5.9. Total nurse staffing is 4.01 hours per resident day in 2026Q1, compared with the Florida average of 3.83.
Independent research from official CMS public records. No paid ranking. No Trust Hub quality score.
Research this nursing home using CMS and federal public records. CMS Certification Number 106013.
At a glance
5 of 5
5 of 5
5 of 5
3 of 5
No attached CMS ownership-change event.
These are CMS star ratings, not Trust Hub ratings. Missing evidence is shown as not reported, not as zero.
Quality & care evidence
Staffing, inspections, and fire safety are separate CMS evidence families below.
Ownership & management
Current ownership uses CURRENT OWNED_BY evidence only. UNKNOWN is not a former owner.
Showing 25 of 44 relationships from CMS/PECOS evidence.
These relationships were observed in an older snapshot. UNKNOWN does not mean former owner, previous owner, or that ownership ended.
Ownership change history
No CMS ownership-change event is currently attached to this profile in the Trust Hub research graph. That is not proof that ownership never changed.
Source freshness
Profile generated 2026-11-03. That timestamp is not CMS evidence freshness.
Methodology
CMS overview
No proprietary TrustHub score. These ratings are published separately by CMS. How CMS ratings and facility records are read
Facility information
CMS remains the primary federal record. Public website and additional contact details appear only when independently verified.
CMS designations
This CMS Certification Number appears in the latest CMS Nursing Home Provider Information extract of currently listed nursing homes.
CMS does not currently identify this nursing home as a Special Focus Facility or candidate in the loaded Provider Information extract.
CMS field value: (blank). Observed Aug 1, 2026.
CMS does not currently apply its abuse-icon designation to this facility in the loaded Provider Information extract.
CMS field value: N. Observed Aug 1, 2026.
Enrollment identity
These identifiers come from CMS SNF enrollment records linked to this CCN. They are not a substitute for the CMS Certification Number.
MDS quality measures
These MDS quality measures are individual CMS-published scores. They are not the CMS quality-measure star rating.
MDS source release 2026-08-01.
Fire-safety citations
These are fire-safety citations, not health deficiencies and not a count of fires.
Decision guide
Factual evidence to examine before you decide. These summaries are not a score or recommendation.
CMS publishes a 5-star staffing rating for this facility.
RN staffing was 1.35 hours per resident day in 2026Q1, calculated from CMS PBJ records.
View staffing evidenceThe latest standard inspection on Apr 17, 2025 cited 1 deficiencies.
View inspection evidenceCMS-published records list 89 ownership or control parties.
View ownership evidenceCMS groups this facility with a chain covering 17 facilities across 10 states or territories.
View chain evidenceOwnership & operation
Operator, licensee, owner, manager, and chain stay separate. A connected organization is not automatically the party that runs daily operations.
SeniorTrustHub found evidence connecting this facility to:
20 currently connected nursing homes share this CMS organization identity with OAK INVESTMENT TRUST.
Ownership
These are CMS-published ownership disclosures. Medicare enrollment ownership and managerial-control information is reported by enrolled providers through CMS forms; it is not an independent determination of beneficial ownership.
Organization · 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Association date reported to CMS: May 1, 2007
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Organization · 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Association date reported to CMS: May 1, 2007
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Organization · 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Association date reported to CMS: May 1, 2007
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Organization · 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2014
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Organization · 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2014
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Individual · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Sep 1, 2024
Individual · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Jun 11, 2025
Organization · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: May 1, 2007
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Organization · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: May 1, 2007
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Organization · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: May 1, 2007
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Individual · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Feb 1, 2024
Organization · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2014
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Organization · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2014
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Organization · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Apr 1, 2025
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Individual · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Apr 1, 2018
Individual · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2014
Organization · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2025
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Organization · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2025
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Organization · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2014
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Individual · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Feb 1, 2024
Individual · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Mar 1, 2022
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Association date reported to CMS: Sep 23, 2021
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2014
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Association date reported to CMS: Feb 1, 2024
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Association date reported to CMS: Feb 1, 2024
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Association date reported to CMS: Apr 1, 2018
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Association date reported to CMS: May 7, 2015
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Association date reported to CMS: May 7, 2015
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Association date reported to CMS: Feb 1, 2024
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Association date reported to CMS: Mar 1, 2022
Individual · INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Apr 15, 2025
Individual · INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Apr 10, 2025
Individual · INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Apr 10, 2025
Individual · OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Association date reported to CMS: Aug 31, 2021
Individual · OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Association date reported to CMS: Sep 1, 2024
Individual · OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2014
Individual · OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Association date reported to CMS: Jun 1, 2025
Individual · OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Association date reported to CMS: Feb 1, 2024
Individual · OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Association date reported to CMS: Feb 1, 2024
Organization · OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Association date reported to CMS: Nov 23, 2020
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Individual · OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Association date reported to CMS: Apr 1, 2018
Individual · OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2014
Individual · OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Association date reported to CMS: Feb 1, 2024
Individual · OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
Association date reported to CMS: Mar 1, 2022
Organization · 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Published ownership percentage: 100%
Association date reported to CMS: May 1, 2007
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Organization · 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Published ownership percentage: 100%
Association date reported to CMS: May 1, 2007
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Organization · 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Association date reported to CMS: May 1, 2007
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Organization · 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2014
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 2 across FL, MI, PA.
Organization · 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2014
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Organization · 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2025
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 24 across AZ, CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, IL, KS, MD, MI, MN, NJ, PA, TN, TX, VA, WA.
Organization · 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2025
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 24 across AZ, CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, IL, KS, MD, MI, MN, NJ, PA, TN, TX, VA, WA.
Organization · 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2014
CMS classifications: Parent company
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 15 across AZ, CA, CT, FL, GA, IL, MD, MN, TN, WA.
Individual · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Sep 1, 2024
Individual · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Jun 11, 2025
Organization · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: May 1, 2007
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Organization · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: May 1, 2007
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Organization · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: May 1, 2007
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Individual · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Feb 1, 2024
Organization · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2014
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 2 across FL, MI, PA.
Organization · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2014
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 0 across FL.
Organization · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Apr 1, 2025
CMS classifications: Chain / home office, Management services company
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 17 across CO, FL, KS, MA, MD, MI, NJ, PA, TX, VA.
Individual · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Apr 1, 2018
Individual · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2014
Organization · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2025
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 24 across AZ, CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, IL, KS, MD, MI, MN, NJ, PA, TN, TX, VA, WA.
Organization · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2025
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 24 across AZ, CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, IL, KS, MD, MI, MN, NJ, PA, TN, TX, VA, WA.
Organization · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2014
Other facilities connected through this exact CMS organization identity: 15 across AZ, CA, CT, FL, GA, IL, MD, MN, TN, WA.
Individual · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Feb 1, 2024
Individual · ADP OF THE SNF
Association date reported to CMS: Mar 1, 2022
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Association date reported to CMS: Sep 23, 2021
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Association date reported to CMS: Jan 1, 2014
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Association date reported to CMS: Feb 1, 2024
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Association date reported to CMS: Feb 1, 2024
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Association date reported to CMS: Apr 1, 2018
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Association date reported to CMS: May 7, 2015
Individual · CORPORATE OFFICER
Association date reported to CMS: May 7, 2015
Roles are shown as CMS publishes them. Different CMS sources can describe different enrollment, ownership, and control concepts, so TrustHub keeps each source-specific disclosure distinct.
Chain context
Chain-level values describe this CMS-defined group, not any one facility. CMS Chain ID 756 is a grouping identifier, not a legal organization.
| Month | Facilities | Overall rating | Staffing rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wed Jul | 17 | 4.2 | 4.8 |
| Mon Jun | 17 | 4.2 | 4.9 |
| Fri May | 17 | 4.2 | 4.9 |
| Wed Apr | 17 | 4 | 4.9 |
| Sun Mar | 17 | 4.1 | 4.9 |
| Sun Feb | 17 | 4.5 | 4.9 |
Nursing Home Chain Performance Measures, fixed version da2db00a-0f3d-40a9-a535-588ff1220c55. Membership comes separately from CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Enrollments.
View official CMS sourceInspections & deficiencies
Scope and severity terms below are CMS classifications. They are not a TrustHub score.
No health-deficiency rows were deterministically linked to this inspection.
Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
CMS scope/severity D: Isolated; No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy.
Correction status: Deficient, Provider has date of correction (May 17, 2025)
No health-deficiency rows were deterministically linked to this inspection.
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
CMS scope/severity D: Isolated; No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy.
Correction status: Deficient, Provider has date of correction (Feb 18, 2024)
Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
CMS scope/severity E: Pattern; No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy.
Correction status: Deficient, Provider has date of correction (Feb 18, 2024)
No health-deficiency rows were deterministically linked to this inspection.
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
CMS scope/severity B: Pattern; No actual harm with potential for minimal harm.
Correction status: Deficient, Provider has date of correction (Oct 7, 2022)
Penalties & enforcement
No penalty records were found for this provider in the currently loaded CMS Penalties dataset.
Facility history
4 historical events available. Dates and values come from published CMS and official state regulator evidence, not a score.
Total nurse staffing decreased from 4.45 to 4.01 hours per resident day between 2025Q4 and 2026Q1. Staffing declined across those reported periods.
4.45 → 4.01
CMS · Reported in a source release · View related evidence
1 deficiency was recorded.
CMS · Recorded event date · View related evidence
2 deficiencies were recorded.
CMS · Recorded event date · View related evidence
1 deficiency was recorded.
CMS · Recorded event date · View related evidence
Staffing
CMS staffing rating: 5 of 5 stars. CMS calculates that rating separately using its published methodology. The values below are calculations from daily PBJ records for 2026Q1 (current source quarter).
| Measure | Monday–Friday | Saturday–Sunday |
|---|---|---|
| Total nursing | 4.155 | 3.664 |
| RN categories | 1.455 | 1.101 |
Contract staff accounted for 0% of reported nursing hours included in this quarter calculation.
Reported RN-category hours per resident day were 0.114 lower than the prior loaded quarter.
Solid bar: Total nursing · Outlined bar: RN categories
| Quarter | Total nursing | RN categories | LPN/LVN | CNA | Contract share | Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025Q2 | 4.5 | 1.487 | 0.285 | 2.169 | 0% | 91 |
| 2025Q3 | 4.508 | 1.432 | 0.366 | 2.153 | 0% | 92 |
| 2025Q4 | 4.453 | 1.466 | 0.277 | 2.179 | 0% | 92 |
| 2026Q1 | 4.013 | 1.353 | 0.266 | 1.928 | 0% | 90 |
Hours-per-resident-day values are calculated by this platform from CMS-published daily PBJ hours and MDS census. For each displayed period, included hours are summed and divided by the summed census for days with a positive census. They are not CMS case-mix-adjusted staffing measures or a staffing rating.
View official CMS PBJ sourceWhat we can verify today
These measures come from the current successfully ingested CMS Nursing Home Provider Information release.
Trust participation
Claims, corrections, and factual context are free. Submissions never replace CMS evidence or affect ranking.
Representation claims are reviewed manually. Live profile-management tools are not yet enabled for this facility.
How corrections workSource register
No paid placements. Facilities cannot pay to rank higher. We cite. You decide.